Finding Your Unique Artistic Voice
Summary
The Signal Problem
Artists today face a particular trap: getting sucked into making art for other people while forgetting the original reason they wanted to become artists. Instead of developing their own style and aesthetic, they chase whatever is popular in industries where they want jobs, whatever gets likes or watch time on social media. They never develop their own signal.
Using the metaphor of sound, artists need to initially develop a clear signal so they have something to say, a clear visual note that people understand. Only then does it make sense to think about amplifying that signal, turning up the volume so people can hear it. Yet most artistic education does the opposite, teaching volume before signal. The result is technically impressive work that says nothing in particular.
Core Insights
The Industry Training Problem
Educational systems and industry structures have trained artists to fit into production pipelines rather than discover what makes them unique. From early illustration jobs to modern concept art workflows, artists have been taught to sublimate personal style to serve commercial needs. This creates formulaic approaches that ironically are now being replicated by AI systems.
The great film poster illustrators, the concept artists, the animators at Disney since the 1930s all had to figure out how to fit in and create professional work in service of products rather than expressing themselves. This bifurcation between capital-A Art and practical illustration robbed many artists of a sense of authorship. The skills that make you successful in one context become obstacles in another. Yet artists who left their mark on productions, like Gustaf Tenggren who designed Pinocchio's look or Mary Blair who defined Disney's visual style, all had something unique to say. They had developed a clear signal first.
Signal Versus Volume
Volume encompasses everything artists get taught to do: strong compositions, proper color theory, contrast that draws the eye, techniques that amplify messages. These are the tools from illustration manuals and concept art courses. Signal, by contrast, is the actual message, the feelings and emotions, the vibe that comes from your combination of life experiences. The distinction matters because volume without signal creates art that demands attention but has nothing to say.
Many creators fall into this trap on social media, getting caught up in retention-style editing, using lowest common denominators of drama or controversy to hook viewers with no real content underneath. Someone is screaming but there is no interesting story. The same happens with visual art when artists add rim lights, dramatic contrast, and impressive rendering to work that lacks any authentic point of view. Volume works for some art styles, but figuring out what you are about requires careful thought about the actual message being communicated. And crucially, this often cannot be articulated verbally. Style is ephemeral, a non-verbal construct experienced through contact with the work.
Finding Your Signal
The practical path forward involves turning down the volume temporarily to better hear your authentic voice. This means studying artists who create the specific mood and style you aspire to, paying attention not just to their technical approach but to the rules they consciously ignore. Artists with strong styles often do just one or two things exceptionally well while ignoring entire categories of illustration theory.
Building signal requires permission to experiment without seeking approval. School environments reward students for adding contrast or following established formulas. Algorithms reward content that triggers predictable responses. Neither system helps discover genuine artistic identity. The challenge is that developing and nurturing your own point of view takes time and cannot scale into a curriculum. But as AI systems remain trapped in language and formulaic approaches, authentic non-verbal expression becomes increasingly valuable. The more your visual message cannot be replicated by someone typing prompts, the more valuable your perspective becomes.
Key Takeaways
Analytical: Educational environments and algorithms push artists toward approval-seeking patterns. What gets likes, what lecturers praise, what matches industry expectations. These systems train formulaic approaches rather than nurturing authentic signal. The environments designed to teach art are often poorly suited to bringing forth what is unique inside each artist.
Simple: Your unique non-verbal perspective is the thing AI cannot replicate. The more you can articulate feelings visually in ways that cannot be typed into a prompt, the more valuable your signal becomes.
Practical: Focus specifically on the art you want to make and study how similar artists have made their style work. Appreciate that developing signal takes time and cannot be rushed. Give yourself permission to turn down the volume on technical impressiveness to better hear your authentic voice.
Philosophical: The search for your signal is part of the signal itself. The challenges you overcome while discovering your style become part of what makes your perspective valuable and interesting. Rather than seeking shortcuts, embrace the process of discovery as essential to developing authentic artistic voice.
Try This
Step 1: Identify three artists whose work gives you a specific feeling you want your own art to create. Study what rules of illustration they follow and which ones they deliberately ignore.
Step 2: Create a piece of work focused entirely on the feeling or mood you want to communicate. Resist the urge to add impressive technical elements that do not serve that specific message.
Step 3: Journal about what aspects of your life experience, interests, and perspective could inform a visual style that cannot be easily replicated. What non-verbal message do you want people to receive?